Lansvale vs Liverpool, NSW suburb comparison

Lansvale for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LansvaleLiverpool

Overall score

Lansvale

49.6/100

Liverpool

56.3/100

Crime rate

Lansvale

168.6 / 1k

Liverpool

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lansvale

64

Liverpool

853

Population

Lansvale

2,595

Liverpool

31,078

Metric leadLansvale 3Liverpool 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLansvaleLiverpool
Overall score49.6/10056.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.4/10018.6/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools814
Parks & reserves1424
Public transport stops60277
Walkability36.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities64853
Planning activity530
Population2,59531,078
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lansvale is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Liverpool is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Lansvale pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Liverpool is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.

Lansvale suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Liverpool is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons