Overall score
Ashcroft
26.1/100
Lurnea
31.0/100
Ashcroft vs Lurnea, NSW Suburb Comparison
Ashcroft for retirees; Lurnea for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AshcroftLurnea
Crime rate
Ashcroft
72.9 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashcroft
37
Lurnea
116
Population
Ashcroft
3,634
Lurnea
10,057
Metric leadAshcroft 4Lurnea 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashcroft | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.1/100 | 31.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 14.0/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 16 | 11 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 127 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 116 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 10 |
| Green cover | 21.1% | 9.7% |
| Population | 3,634 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Ashcroft is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ashcroft sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lurnea is in a middle-ring position.
Ashcroft tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Lurnea stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Ashcroft suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Lurnea is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.