Overall score
Ashcroft
34.3/100
Lurnea
47.5/100
Ashcroft vs Lurnea, NSW suburb comparison
Ashcroft for retirees and families; Lurnea for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AshcroftLurnea
Crime rate
Ashcroft
72.9 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashcroft
31
Lurnea
107
Population
Ashcroft
3,634
Lurnea
10,057
Metric leadAshcroft 3Lurnea 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashcroft | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.3/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 29.6/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 16 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 127 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 8 |
| Population | 3,634 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Ashcroft is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, while Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ashcroft sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lurnea is in a middle-ring position.
Ashcroft tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Lurnea stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.
Ashcroft suits retirees more clearly, whereas Lurnea is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.