Heckenberg vs Lurnea, NSW Suburb Comparison

Heckenberg for retirees; Lurnea for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HeckenbergLurnea

Overall score

Heckenberg

31.3/100

Lurnea

31.0/100

Crime rate

Heckenberg

72.9 / 1k

Lurnea

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Heckenberg

53

Lurnea

116

Population

Heckenberg

3,263

Lurnea

10,057

Metric leadHeckenberg 5Lurnea 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHeckenbergLurnea
Overall score31.3/10031.0/100
Housing (desirability)24.7/10040.8/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1411
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves413
Public transport stops51127
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities53116
Planning activity110
Green cover12.8%9.7%
Population3,26310,057
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Heckenberg is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Heckenberg is stronger for a quieter safety profile, plus schools and education options; Lurnea answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Retirees may find Heckenberg the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lurnea.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons