Heckenberg vs Lurnea, NSW suburb comparison

Heckenberg for retirees; Lurnea for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HeckenbergLurnea

Overall score

Heckenberg

37.8/100

Lurnea

47.5/100

Crime rate

Heckenberg

72.9 / 1k

Lurnea

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Heckenberg

42

Lurnea

107

Population

Heckenberg

3,263

Lurnea

10,057

Metric leadHeckenberg 2Lurnea 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHeckenbergLurnea
Overall score37.8/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)42.3/10048.4/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1411
Parks & reserves413
Public transport stops51127
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities42107
Planning activity548
Population3,26310,057
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Heckenberg is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Heckenberg is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Lurnea answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.

Retirees may find Heckenberg the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Lurnea.

Related comparisons