Overall score
Heckenberg
37.8/100
Lurnea
47.5/100
Heckenberg for retirees; Lurnea for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Heckenberg
37.8/100
Lurnea
47.5/100
Crime rate
Heckenberg
72.9 / 1k
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Heckenberg
42
Lurnea
107
Population
Heckenberg
3,263
Lurnea
10,057
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Heckenberg | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.8/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 51 | 127 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 42 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 54 | 8 |
| Population | 3,263 | 10,057 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Heckenberg is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, and Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Heckenberg is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Lurnea answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.
Retirees may find Heckenberg the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Lurnea.