Ashcroft vs Miller, NSW Suburb Comparison

Ashcroft for schools; Miller for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AshcroftMiller

Overall score

Ashcroft

26.1/100

Miller

40.8/100

Crime rate

Ashcroft

72.9 / 1k

Miller

73.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ashcroft

37

Miller

98

Population

Ashcroft

3,634

Miller

3,374

Metric leadAshcroft 5Miller 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAshcroftMiller
Overall score26.1/10040.8/100
Housing (desirability)14.0/10028.3/100
Crime rate72.9 / 1k73.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1615
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves46
Public transport stops3861
Walkability30.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities3798
Planning activity27
Green cover21.1%15.5%
Population3,6343,374
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Ashcroft reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Miller is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Ashcroft sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Miller is in a middle-ring position.

Ashcroft tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Miller stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Households prioritising schools may find Ashcroft the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Miller.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons