Overall score
Ashcroft
26.1/100
Miller
40.8/100
Ashcroft for schools; Miller for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ashcroft
26.1/100
Miller
40.8/100
Crime rate
Ashcroft
72.9 / 1k
Miller
73.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashcroft
37
Miller
98
Population
Ashcroft
3,634
Miller
3,374
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashcroft | Miller |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.1/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 14.0/100 | 28.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.9 / 1k | 73.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 16 | 15 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 61 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 98 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 7 |
| Green cover | 21.1% | 15.5% |
| Population | 3,634 | 3,374 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Ashcroft reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Miller is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Ashcroft sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Miller is in a middle-ring position.
Ashcroft tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Miller stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Households prioritising schools may find Ashcroft the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Miller.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.