Miller vs Prestons, NSW Suburb Comparison

Miller for retirees and families; Prestons for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MillerPrestons

Overall score

Miller

40.8/100

Prestons

44.7/100

Crime rate

Miller

73.0 / 1k

Prestons

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Miller

98

Prestons

186

Population

Miller

3,374

Prestons

15,694

Metric leadMiller 4Prestons 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMillerPrestons
Overall score40.8/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)28.3/10038.4/100
Crime rate73.0 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools155
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves615
Public transport stops61156
Walkability57.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities98186
Planning activity726
Green cover15.5%9.0%
Population3,37415,694
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Miller is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Miller is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Prestons answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Prestons, while Miller remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons