Overall score
Miller
48.6/100
Prestons
57.6/100
Miller vs Prestons, NSW suburb comparison
Prestons for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MillerPrestons
Crime rate
Miller
73.0 / 1k
Prestons
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Miller
84
Prestons
167
Population
Miller
3,374
Prestons
15,694
Metric leadMiller 3Prestons 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Miller | Prestons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.6/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 31.4/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 73.0 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 61 | 156 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 84 | 167 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 21 |
| Population | 3,374 | 15,694 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Miller is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Miller is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Prestons answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Miller generally means more approachable housing costs, while Prestons leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Prestons, while Miller remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.