Overall score
Edmondson Park
60.6/100
Prestons
57.6/100
Edmondson Park for retirees and families; Prestons for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Edmondson Park
60.6/100
Prestons
57.6/100
Crime rate
Edmondson Park
29.8 / 1k
Prestons
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Edmondson Park
92
Prestons
167
Population
Edmondson Park
12,080
Prestons
15,694
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Edmondson Park | Prestons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.6/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.0/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.8 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 74 | 156 |
| Walkability | 65.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 92 | 167 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 21 |
| Population | 12,080 | 15,694 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Edmondson Park reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Edmondson Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and walkability; Prestons answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.
Edmondson Park suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Prestons is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.