Edmondson Park vs Prestons, NSW Suburb Comparison

Edmondson Park for retirees and families; Prestons for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Edmondson ParkPrestons

Overall score

Edmondson Park

54.8/100

Prestons

44.7/100

Crime rate

Edmondson Park

29.8 / 1k

Prestons

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Edmondson Park

103

Prestons

186

Population

Edmondson Park

12,080

Prestons

15,694

Metric leadEdmondson Park 6Prestons 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEdmondson ParkPrestons
Overall score54.8/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)20.8/10038.4/100
Crime rate29.8 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves215
Public transport stops74156
Walkability65.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities103186
Planning activity1426
Green cover14.2%9.0%
Population12,08015,694
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Edmondson Park reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Edmondson Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and overall desirability; Prestons answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Edmondson Park suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Prestons is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons