Carnes Hill vs Prestons, NSW Suburb Comparison

Carnes Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Carnes HillPrestons

Overall score

Carnes Hill

63.7/100

Prestons

44.7/100

Crime rate

Carnes Hill

21.0 / 1k

Prestons

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carnes Hill

115

Prestons

186

Population

Carnes Hill

3,332

Prestons

15,694

Metric leadCarnes Hill 6Prestons 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarnes HillPrestons
Overall score63.7/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10038.4/100
Crime rate21.0 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools85
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves115
Public transport stops9156
Walkability83.5/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities115186
Planning activity126
Green cover8.8%9.0%
Population3,33215,694
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Carnes Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Carnes Hill tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Prestons stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Carnes Hill, while Prestons remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons