Overall score
Carnes Hill
63.6/100
Edmondson Park
60.6/100
Carnes Hill for retirees and families; Edmondson Park for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Carnes Hill
63.6/100
Edmondson Park
60.6/100
Crime rate
Carnes Hill
21.0 / 1k
Edmondson Park
29.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Carnes Hill
107
Edmondson Park
92
Population
Carnes Hill
3,332
Edmondson Park
12,080
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Carnes Hill | Edmondson Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.6/100 | 60.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.7/100 | 35.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.0 / 1k | 29.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 74 |
| Walkability | 83.5/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 107 | 92 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 12 |
| Population | 3,332 | 12,080 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Carnes Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Edmondson Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Carnes Hill is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Edmondson Park answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.
Choose Carnes Hill if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Edmondson Park for households prioritising schools.