Carnes Hill vs Edmondson Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Carnes Hill for retirees and families; Edmondson Park for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Carnes HillEdmondson Park

Overall score

Carnes Hill

63.7/100

Edmondson Park

54.8/100

Crime rate

Carnes Hill

21.0 / 1k

Edmondson Park

29.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carnes Hill

115

Edmondson Park

103

Population

Carnes Hill

3,332

Edmondson Park

12,080

Metric leadCarnes Hill 7Edmondson Park 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarnes HillEdmondson Park
Overall score63.7/10054.8/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10020.8/100
Crime rate21.0 / 1k29.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools85
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops974
Walkability83.5/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities115103
Planning activity114
Green cover8.8%14.2%
Population3,33212,080
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Carnes Hill is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Edmondson Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Carnes Hill is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Edmondson Park answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and a larger local community.

Choose Carnes Hill if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Edmondson Park for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons