Hoxton Park vs Miller, NSW suburb comparison

Hoxton Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hoxton ParkMiller

Overall score

Hoxton Park

51.5/100

Miller

48.6/100

Crime rate

Hoxton Park

20.9 / 1k

Miller

73.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hoxton Park

69

Miller

84

Population

Hoxton Park

4,572

Miller

3,374

Metric leadHoxton Park 6Miller 5across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHoxton ParkMiller
Overall score51.5/10048.6/100
Housing (desirability)56.7/10031.4/100
Crime rate20.9 / 1k73.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools915
Parks & reserves46
Public transport stops3761
Walkability32.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities6984
Planning activity37
Population4,5723,374
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Hoxton Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Miller is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Hoxton Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Miller is the better pick for schools and education options and parks and reserves. Hoxton Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Miller leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hoxton Park, while Miller remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons