Hoxton Park vs Miller, NSW Suburb Comparison

Hoxton Park for investment and value; Miller for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hoxton ParkMiller

Overall score

Hoxton Park

49.0/100

Miller

40.8/100

Crime rate

Hoxton Park

20.9 / 1k

Miller

73.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hoxton Park

81

Miller

98

Population

Hoxton Park

4,572

Miller

3,374

Metric leadHoxton Park 6Miller 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHoxton ParkMiller
Overall score49.0/10040.8/100
Housing (desirability)38.8/10028.3/100
Crime rate20.9 / 1k73.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools915
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves46
Public transport stops3761
Walkability32.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities8198
Planning activity37
Green cover14.2%15.5%
Population4,5723,374
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Hoxton Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Miller is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Hoxton Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Miller is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hoxton Park, while Miller remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons