Cessnock vs Neath, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cessnock for retirees and families; Neath for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CessnockNeath

Overall score

Cessnock

37.6/100

Neath

31.9/100

Crime rate

Cessnock

96.9 / 1k

Neath

78.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cessnock

165

Neath

17

Population

Cessnock

16,300

Neath

430

Metric leadCessnock 6Neath 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCessnockNeath
Overall score37.6/10031.9/100
Housing (desirability)35.3/10070.7/100
Crime rate96.9 / 1k78.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Weather (desirability)56.4/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves19—
Public transport stops28026
Walkability83.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities16517
Planning activity733
Green cover10.6%29.1%
Population16,300430
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cessnock is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Neath is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Cessnock sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Neath is further out with more breathing room.

Cessnock tends to lead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, while Neath stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Cessnock sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Neath.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cessnock, while Neath remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons