Overall score
Cessnock
55.6/100
Kearsley
34.8/100
Cessnock for families and schools; Kearsley for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cessnock
55.6/100
Kearsley
34.8/100
Crime rate
Cessnock
96.9 / 1k
Kearsley
97.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cessnock
157
Kearsley
21
Population
Cessnock
16,300
Kearsley
838
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cessnock | Kearsley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.6/100 | 34.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.2/100 | 82.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 96.9 / 1k | 97.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 19 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 280 | 31 |
| Walkability | 79.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 157 | 21 |
| Planning activity | 62 | 3 |
| Population | 16,300 | 838 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Cessnock reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Kearsley is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Cessnock sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Kearsley is more regionally self-contained.
Cessnock pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Kearsley is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Cessnock if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Kearsley for investors.