Kearsley vs Kitchener, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kearsley for families and investment; Kitchener for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KearsleyKitchener

Overall score

Kearsley

38.3/100

Kitchener

32.3/100

Crime rate

Kearsley

97.1 / 1k

Kitchener

97.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kearsley

22

Kitchener

17

Population

Kearsley

838

Kitchener

679

Metric leadKearsley 7Kitchener 33 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKearsleyKitchener
Overall score38.3/10032.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.9/10046.6/100
Crime rate97.1 / 1k97.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)60.5/10056.4/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops3123
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities2217
Planning activity76
Green cover40.6%0.3%
Population838679
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kearsley is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Kitchener is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Kearsley pulls ahead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Kitchener is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kitchener, while Kearsley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons