Charnwood vs Holt, ACT Suburb Comparison

Charnwood for families and investment; Holt for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharnwoodHolt

Overall score

Charnwood

57.0/100

Holt

55.9/100

Crime rate

Charnwood

28.7 / 1k

Holt

25.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charnwood

196

Holt

298

Population

Charnwood

3,055

Holt

5,628

Metric leadCharnwood 4Holt 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharnwoodHolt
Overall score57.0/10055.9/100
Housing (desirability)70.0/10063.6/100
Crime rate28.7 / 1k25.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves51
Walkability96.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities196298
Planning activity59
Green cover3.7%13.2%
Population3,0555,628
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Charnwood is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Holt is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Charnwood pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Holt is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Charnwood generally means more mid-market housing value, while Holt leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Charnwood the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Holt.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Charnwood vs Holt, ACT Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide