Charnwood vs Melba, ACT Suburb Comparison

Charnwood for investment; Melba for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharnwoodMelba

Overall score

Charnwood

57.0/100

Melba

59.8/100

Crime rate

Charnwood

28.7 / 1k

Melba

12.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charnwood

196

Melba

120

Population

Charnwood

3,055

Melba

3,383

Metric leadCharnwood 3Melba 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharnwoodMelba
Overall score57.0/10059.8/100
Housing (desirability)70.0/10059.3/100
Crime rate28.7 / 1k12.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves5—
Walkability96.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities196120
Planning activity53
Green cover3.7%20.3%
Population3,0553,383
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Charnwood is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Melba is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Charnwood is stronger for walkability, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Melba answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and overall desirability. Charnwood generally means more mid-market housing value, while Melba leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Melba, while Charnwood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons