Overall score
Fraser
52.4/100
Melba
59.8/100
Melba for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fraser
52.4/100
Melba
59.8/100
Crime rate
Fraser
9.0 / 1k
Melba
12.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fraser
77
Melba
120
Population
Fraser
2,126
Melba
3,383
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fraser | Melba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.4/100 | 59.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.6/100 | 59.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.0 / 1k | 12.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 77 | 120 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 3 |
| Green cover | 12.2% | 20.3% |
| Population | 2,126 | 3,383 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Fraser is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Melba is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Fraser tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Melba stands out for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Fraser if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Melba for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.