Overall score
Chevallum
39.7/100
Mons
46.8/100
Chevallum for families; Mons for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chevallum
39.7/100
Mons
46.8/100
Crime rate
Chevallum
27.4 / 1k
Mons
22.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chevallum
5
Mons
10
Population
Chevallum
467
Mons
1,179
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chevallum | Mons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.7/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.3/100 | 41.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.4 / 1k | 22.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 10 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 467 | 1,179 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Chevallum reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Mons is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.
On the data, Chevallum is stronger for overall desirability; Mons answers with a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Chevallum generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Mons leans toward more sought-after housing.
Chevallum suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mons is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.