Chevallum vs Mons, QLD Suburb Comparison

Chevallum for families; Mons for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChevallumMons

Overall score

Chevallum

39.7/100

Mons

46.8/100

Crime rate

Chevallum

27.4 / 1k

Mons

22.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chevallum

5

Mons

10

Population

Chevallum

467

Mons

1,179

Metric leadChevallum 1Mons 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChevallumMons
Overall score39.7/10046.8/100
Housing (desirability)45.3/10041.4/100
Crime rate27.4 / 1k22.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities510
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population4671,179
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chevallum reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Mons is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

On the data, Chevallum is stronger for overall desirability; Mons answers with a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Chevallum generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Mons leans toward more sought-after housing.

Chevallum suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mons is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons