Overall score
Buderim
61.6/100
Mons
46.8/100
Buderim for retirees and families; Mons for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Buderim
61.6/100
Mons
46.8/100
Crime rate
Buderim
22.7 / 1k
Mons
22.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Buderim
154
Mons
10
Population
Buderim
31,430
Mons
1,179
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Buderim | Mons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.5/100 | 41.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.7 / 1k | 22.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 59 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 78 | 2 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 154 | 10 |
| Green cover | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 31,430 | 1,179 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Buderim is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Mons is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Buderim sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mons is further out with more breathing room.
Buderim pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Mons is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Buderim suits value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mons is the stronger match for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.