Overall score
Chirnside Park
54.5/100
Kilsyth
68.4/100
Chirnside Park for retirees and investment; Kilsyth for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chirnside Park
54.5/100
Kilsyth
68.4/100
Crime rate
Chirnside Park
65.6 / 1k
Kilsyth
58.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chirnside Park
63
Kilsyth
260
Population
Chirnside Park
11,779
Kilsyth
11,699
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chirnside Park | Kilsyth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.5/100 | 68.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.7/100 | 68.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.6 / 1k | 58.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 20 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 56 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 63 | 260 |
| Planning activity | 104 | 230 |
| Population | 11,779 | 11,699 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Chirnside Park is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Kilsyth is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Chirnside Park pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community, whereas Kilsyth is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Chirnside Park suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Kilsyth is the stronger match for families and value-focused buyers.