Overall score
Chirnside Park
40.9/100
Mount Evelyn
60.7/100
Chirnside Park for families; Mount Evelyn for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chirnside Park
40.9/100
Mount Evelyn
60.7/100
Crime rate
Chirnside Park
67.6 / 1k
Mount Evelyn
31.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chirnside Park
114
Mount Evelyn
200
Population
Chirnside Park
11,779
Mount Evelyn
9,799
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chirnside Park | Mount Evelyn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.9/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.1/100 | 54.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 67.6 / 1k | 31.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 41 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 114 | 200 |
| Planning activity | 104 | 152 |
| Green cover | 1.7% | 10.0% |
| Population | 11,779 | 9,799 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Chirnside Park is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Mount Evelyn is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Chirnside Park pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Mount Evelyn is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
Chirnside Park suits retirees more clearly, whereas Mount Evelyn is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.