Overall score
Chirnside Park
54.5/100
Mount Evelyn
69.2/100
Chirnside Park for retirees; Mount Evelyn for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chirnside Park
54.5/100
Mount Evelyn
69.2/100
Crime rate
Chirnside Park
65.6 / 1k
Mount Evelyn
34.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chirnside Park
63
Mount Evelyn
184
Population
Chirnside Park
11,779
Mount Evelyn
9,799
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chirnside Park | Mount Evelyn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.5/100 | 69.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.7/100 | 67.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.6 / 1k | 34.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 41 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 63 | 184 |
| Planning activity | 104 | 152 |
| Population | 11,779 | 9,799 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Chirnside Park is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Mount Evelyn is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Chirnside Park pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community, whereas Mount Evelyn is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Chirnside Park suits retirees more clearly, whereas Mount Evelyn is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.