Chisholm vs Monash, ACT Suburb Comparison

Monash for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChisholmMonash

Overall score

Chisholm

50.5/100

Monash

47.4/100

Crime rate

Chisholm

21.4 / 1k

Monash

14.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chisholm

127

Monash

131

Population

Chisholm

5,268

Monash

5,644

Metric leadChisholm 3Monash 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChisholmMonash
Overall score50.5/10047.4/100
Housing (desirability)58.5/10066.9/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k14.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Walkability84.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities127131
Planning activity45
Green cover8.2%11.5%
Population5,2685,644
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Monash is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Chisholm is stronger for walkability, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook; Monash answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities. Chisholm generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Monash leans toward more sought-after housing.

Chisholm suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Monash is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons