Chisholm vs Theodore, ACT Suburb Comparison

Chisholm for retirees and investment; Theodore for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChisholmTheodore

Overall score

Chisholm

50.5/100

Theodore

43.8/100

Crime rate

Chisholm

21.4 / 1k

Theodore

13.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chisholm

127

Theodore

39

Population

Chisholm

5,268

Theodore

3,798

Metric leadChisholm 8Theodore 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChisholmTheodore
Overall score50.5/10043.8/100
Housing (desirability)58.5/10057.0/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k13.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Walkability84.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities12739
Planning activity45
Green cover8.2%5.2%
Population5,2683,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Chisholm reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Theodore is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Chisholm pulls ahead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Theodore is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Chisholm sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Theodore.

Chisholm suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Theodore is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Chisholm vs Theodore, ACT Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide