Overall score
Clarendon
40.3/100
Kangarilla
40.8/100
Clarendon for investment and value; Kangarilla for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clarendon
40.3/100
Kangarilla
40.8/100
Crime rate
Clarendon
21.8 / 1k
Kangarilla
11.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clarendon
12
Kangarilla
7
Population
Clarendon
643
Kangarilla
905
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clarendon | Kangarilla |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.3/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.4/100 | 55.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.8 / 1k | 11.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 2 |
| Walkability | 7.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 12 | 7 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 12 |
| Population | 643 | 905 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Clarendon is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Kangarilla is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Kangarilla sits among greener hillside streets, while Clarendon keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Clarendon pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Kangarilla is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability.
Clarendon suits value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Kangarilla is the stronger match for retirees and families.