Overall score
Aberfoyle Park
72.3/100
Clarendon
40.3/100
Aberfoyle Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aberfoyle Park
72.3/100
Clarendon
40.3/100
Crime rate
Aberfoyle Park
20.7 / 1k
Clarendon
21.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aberfoyle Park
316
Clarendon
12
Population
Aberfoyle Park
11,234
Clarendon
643
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aberfoyle Park | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.3/100 | 40.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.4/100 | 71.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.7 / 1k | 21.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 63 | 2 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 7.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 316 | 12 |
| Planning activity | 80 | 11 |
| Population | 11,234 | 643 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Aberfoyle Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Clarendon is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Aberfoyle Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Clarendon is within day-trip reach of the capital.
On the data, Aberfoyle Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Clarendon answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Aberfoyle Park, while Clarendon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.