Chandlers Hill vs Clarendon, SA suburb comparison

Chandlers Hill for retirees and families; Clarendon for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chandlers HillClarendon

Overall score

Chandlers Hill

35.7/100

Clarendon

40.3/100

Crime rate

Chandlers Hill

7.6 / 1k

Clarendon

21.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chandlers Hill

1

Clarendon

12

Population

Chandlers Hill

792

Clarendon

643

Metric leadChandlers Hill 3Clarendon 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChandlers HillClarendon
Overall score35.7/10040.3/100
Housing (desirability)50.9/10071.4/100
Crime rate7.6 / 1k21.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops12
Walkability1.5/1007.0/100
Nearby amenities112
Planning activity1111
Population792643
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Chandlers Hill reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Clarendon is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Chandlers Hill sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Clarendon is within day-trip reach of the capital.

On the data, Chandlers Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community; Clarendon answers with housing affordability and public transport access.

Choose Chandlers Hill if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Clarendon for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons