Overall score
Chandlers Hill
35.7/100
Coromandel East
35.6/100
Chandlers Hill for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chandlers Hill
35.7/100
Coromandel East
35.6/100
Crime rate
Chandlers Hill
7.6 / 1k
Coromandel East
2.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chandlers Hill
1
Coromandel East
1
Population
Chandlers Hill
792
Coromandel East
345
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chandlers Hill | Coromandel East |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.7/100 | 35.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.9/100 | 30.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.6 / 1k | 2.7 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 5 |
| Population | 792 | 345 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Chandlers Hill is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, and Coromandel East is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.
Chandlers Hill tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Coromandel East stands out for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Chandlers Hill, while Coromandel East remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.