Overall score
Chandlers Hill
35.7/100
Flagstaff Hill
64.8/100
Chandlers Hill for retirees and families; Flagstaff Hill for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chandlers Hill
35.7/100
Flagstaff Hill
64.8/100
Crime rate
Chandlers Hill
7.6 / 1k
Flagstaff Hill
8.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chandlers Hill
1
Flagstaff Hill
77
Population
Chandlers Hill
792
Flagstaff Hill
10,184
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chandlers Hill | Flagstaff Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.7/100 | 64.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.9/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.6 / 1k | 8.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 40 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 77 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 71 |
| Population | 792 | 10,184 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Chandlers Hill reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Flagstaff Hill is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Chandlers Hill tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Flagstaff Hill stands out for housing affordability and public transport access.
Chandlers Hill suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Flagstaff Hill is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.