Clarendon Vale vs Tranmere, TAS suburb comparison

Clarendon Vale for families and schools; Tranmere for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clarendon ValeTranmere

Overall score

Clarendon Vale

43.1/100

Tranmere

46.9/100

Crime rate

Clarendon Vale

2025.2 / 1k

Tranmere

1413.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clarendon Vale

34

Tranmere

42

Population

Clarendon Vale

1,635

Tranmere

2,218

Metric leadClarendon Vale 0Tranmere 81 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClarendon ValeTranmere
Overall score43.1/10046.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate2025.2 / 1k1413.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops1823
Walkability27.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities3442
Population1,6352,218
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clarendon Vale reads as a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Tranmere is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.

Clarendon Vale tends to lead on relatively affordable housing, while Tranmere stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. On housing, Clarendon Vale sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Tranmere.

Clarendon Vale suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Tranmere is the stronger match for retirees and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons