Overall score
Clayton Bay
28.1/100
Milang
37.6/100
Milang for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clayton Bay
28.1/100
Milang
37.6/100
Crime rate
Clayton Bay
23.8 / 1k
Milang
27.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clayton Bay
0
Milang
0
Population
Clayton Bay
472
Milang
962
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clayton Bay | Milang |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.1/100 | 37.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 2.6/100 | 36.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 27.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 19 |
| Population | 472 | 962 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Clayton Bay reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Milang is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Clayton Bay pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Milang is the better pick for housing affordability and overall desirability.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Milang, while Clayton Bay remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.