Clifton Creek vs Sarsfield, VIC Suburb Comparison

Sarsfield for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clifton CreekSarsfield

Overall score

Clifton Creek

32.6/100

Sarsfield

53.3/100

Crime rate

Clifton Creek

22.8 / 1k

Sarsfield

28.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clifton Creek

2

Sarsfield

3

Population

Clifton Creek

252

Sarsfield

543

Metric leadClifton Creek 2Sarsfield 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClifton CreekSarsfield
Overall score32.6/10053.3/100
Housing (desirability)33.9/10052.3/100
Crime rate22.8 / 1k28.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves14
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities23
Planning activity1333
Green cover0.0%3.7%
Population252543
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clifton Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Sarsfield is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Clifton Creek pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Sarsfield is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Clifton Creek the better fit, while retirees, families, and investors are more likely to prefer Sarsfield.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons