Granite Rock vs Sarsfield, VIC Suburb Comparison

Granite Rock for value; Sarsfield for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Granite RockSarsfield

Overall score

Granite Rock

37.3/100

Sarsfield

53.3/100

Crime rate

Granite Rock

80.6 / 1k

Sarsfield

28.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Granite Rock

1

Sarsfield

3

Population

Granite Rock

261

Sarsfield

543

Metric leadGranite Rock 2Sarsfield 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGranite RockSarsfield
Overall score37.3/10053.3/100
Housing (desirability)52.2/10052.3/100
Crime rate80.6 / 1k28.2 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—4
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities13
Planning activity933
Green cover0.9%3.7%
Population261543
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Granite Rock reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Sarsfield is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Granite Rock is stronger for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Sarsfield answers with a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. On housing, Granite Rock sits in a gently premium band, compared with a well priced feel in Sarsfield.

Granite Rock suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Sarsfield is the stronger match for retirees, families, and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons