Overall score
Granite Rock
36.4/100
Sarsfield
40.2/100
Granite Rock vs Sarsfield, VIC suburb comparison
Granite Rock for value; Sarsfield for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Granite RockSarsfield
Crime rate
Granite Rock
54.9 / 1k
Sarsfield
14.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Granite Rock
1
Sarsfield
1
Population
Granite Rock
261
Sarsfield
543
Metric leadGranite Rock 3Sarsfield 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesSarsfield
- Best for familiesSarsfield
- Best for investmentSarsfield
- Best for best valueGranite Rock
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Granite Rock | Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.4/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.6/100 | 34.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.9 / 1k | 14.1 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 33 |
| Population | 261 | 543 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Granite Rock reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Sarsfield is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Granite Rock is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Sarsfield answers with a quieter safety profile and overall desirability.
Granite Rock suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Sarsfield is the stronger match for families and investors.