Clontarf vs Mango Hill, QLD suburb comparison

Clontarf for beach lifestyle; Mango Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClontarfMango Hill

Overall score

Clontarf

65.6/100

Mango Hill

72.2/100

Crime rate

Clontarf

53.0 / 1k

Mango Hill

36.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clontarf

222

Mango Hill

296

Population

Clontarf

8,446

Mango Hill

14,921

Metric leadClontarf 2Mango Hill 53 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClontarfMango Hill
Overall score65.6/10072.2/100
Housing (desirability)94.9/10094.9/100
Crime rate53.0 / 1k36.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Parks & reserves99
Public transport stops3729
Walkability90.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities222296
Population8,44614,921
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clontarf is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Mango Hill is a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living.

Clontarf pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Mango Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Clontarf sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mango Hill.

People chasing a beach lifestyle may find Clontarf the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mango Hill.

Related comparisons