Overall score
Clontarf
65.6/100
Mango Hill
72.2/100
Clontarf for beach lifestyle; Mango Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clontarf
65.6/100
Mango Hill
72.2/100
Crime rate
Clontarf
53.0 / 1k
Mango Hill
36.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clontarf
222
Mango Hill
296
Population
Clontarf
8,446
Mango Hill
14,921
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clontarf | Mango Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.6/100 | 72.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 94.9/100 | 94.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.0 / 1k | 36.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 29 |
| Walkability | 90.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 222 | 296 |
| Population | 8,446 | 14,921 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Clontarf is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Mango Hill is a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living.
Clontarf pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Mango Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Clontarf sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mango Hill.
People chasing a beach lifestyle may find Clontarf the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mango Hill.