Cockatoo Valley vs Kalbeeba, SA Suburb Comparison

Cockatoo Valley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cockatoo ValleyKalbeeba

Overall score

Cockatoo Valley

43.7/100

Kalbeeba

25.2/100

Crime rate

Cockatoo Valley

10.5 / 1k

Kalbeeba

26.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cockatoo Valley

22

Kalbeeba

2

Population

Cockatoo Valley

714

Kalbeeba

411

Metric leadCockatoo Valley 7Kalbeeba 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCockatoo ValleyKalbeeba
Overall score43.7/10025.2/100
Housing (desirability)51.7/10038.5/100
Crime rate10.5 / 1k26.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities222
Planning activity1811
Green cover0.5%0.0%
Population714411
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Cockatoo Valley reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Kalbeeba is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Cockatoo Valley sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Kalbeeba is further out with more breathing room.

Cockatoo Valley pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Kalbeeba is the better pick for walkability and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Cockatoo Valley sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Kalbeeba.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cockatoo Valley, while Kalbeeba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons