Collombatti vs Frederickton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Collombatti for retirees and schools; Frederickton for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CollombattiFrederickton

Overall score

Collombatti

40.4/100

Frederickton

29.3/100

Crime rate

Collombatti

163.8 / 1k

Frederickton

164.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Collombatti

1

Frederickton

11

Population

Collombatti

681

Frederickton

1,452

Metric leadCollombatti 5Frederickton 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCollombattiFrederickton
Overall score40.4/10029.3/100
Housing (desirability)36.1/10062.7/100
Crime rate163.8 / 1k164.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Public transport stops3131
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities111
Planning activity37
Green cover37.9%0.0%
Population6811,452
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Collombatti is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Frederickton is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Collombatti is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Frederickton answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

On balance, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Frederickton, while Collombatti remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons