Frederickton vs Kempsey, NSW Suburb Comparison

Frederickton for value; Kempsey for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FredericktonKempsey

Overall score

Frederickton

29.3/100

Kempsey

36.8/100

Crime rate

Frederickton

164.3 / 1k

Kempsey

164.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Frederickton

11

Kempsey

35

Population

Frederickton

1,452

Kempsey

483

Metric leadFrederickton 3Kempsey 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFredericktonKempsey
Overall score29.3/10036.8/100
Housing (desirability)62.7/10067.6/100
Crime rate164.3 / 1k164.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools15
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops3127
Walkability30.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities1135
Planning activity78
Green cover0.0%2.9%
Population1,452483
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Frederickton reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Kempsey is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Frederickton pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and a larger local community, whereas Kempsey is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Frederickton the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kempsey.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons