Euroka vs Kempsey, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kempsey for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EurokaKempsey

Overall score

Euroka

30.1/100

Kempsey

36.8/100

Crime rate

Euroka

164.9 / 1k

Kempsey

164.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Euroka

0

Kempsey

35

Population

Euroka

348

Kempsey

483

Metric leadEuroka 2Kempsey 91 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEurokaKempsey
Overall score30.1/10036.8/100
Housing (desirability)8.3/10067.6/100
Crime rate164.9 / 1k164.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools15
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops1027
Walkability15.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities035
Planning activity18
Green cover2.2%2.9%
Population348483
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/101/10

Comparison summary

Euroka is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Kempsey is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Euroka pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kempsey is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. On housing, Euroka sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in Kempsey.

Euroka suits retirees more clearly, whereas Kempsey is the stronger match for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons