Kempsey vs Port Macquarie, NSW suburb comparison

Port Macquarie for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KempseyPort Macquarie

Overall score

Kempsey

38.9/100

Port Macquarie

57.6/100

Crime rate

Kempsey

164.2 / 1k

Port Macquarie

86.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kempsey

34

Port Macquarie

139

Population

Kempsey

483

Port Macquarie

47,693

Metric leadKempsey 2Port Macquarie 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKempseyPort Macquarie
Overall score38.9/10057.6/100
Housing (desirability)69.2/10060.2/100
Crime rate164.2 / 1k86.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools56
Parks & reserves237
Public transport stops27653
Walkability36.0/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities34139
Planning activity4238
Population48347,693
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kempsey is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Port Macquarie is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Kempsey is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Port Macquarie answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Kempsey sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Port Macquarie.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Port Macquarie, while Kempsey remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons