Overall score
Condell Park
37.6/100
Georges Hall
51.9/100
Georges Hall for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Condell Park
37.6/100
Georges Hall
51.9/100
Crime rate
Condell Park
115.1 / 1k
Georges Hall
29.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Condell Park
145
Georges Hall
170
Population
Condell Park
13,066
Georges Hall
9,739
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Condell Park | Georges Hall |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.6/100 | 51.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.9/100 | 39.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 115.1 / 1k | 29.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 137 | 120 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 145 | 170 |
| Planning activity | 30 | 18 |
| Green cover | 1.9% | 15.6% |
| Population | 13,066 | 9,739 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Condell Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Georges Hall is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Condell Park pulls ahead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Georges Hall is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Georges Hall, while Condell Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.