Condell Park vs Georges Hall, NSW Suburb Comparison

Georges Hall for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Condell ParkGeorges Hall

Overall score

Condell Park

37.6/100

Georges Hall

51.9/100

Crime rate

Condell Park

115.1 / 1k

Georges Hall

29.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Condell Park

145

Georges Hall

170

Population

Condell Park

13,066

Georges Hall

9,739

Metric leadCondell Park 4Georges Hall 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCondell ParkGeorges Hall
Overall score37.6/10051.9/100
Housing (desirability)38.9/10039.1/100
Crime rate115.1 / 1k29.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools117
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1024
Public transport stops137120
Walkability57.0/10038.0/100
Nearby amenities145170
Planning activity3018
Green cover1.9%15.6%
Population13,0669,739
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Condell Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Georges Hall is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Condell Park pulls ahead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Georges Hall is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Georges Hall, while Condell Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons