Overall score
Condell Park
57.4/100
Georges Hall
59.5/100
Georges Hall for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Condell Park
57.4/100
Georges Hall
59.5/100
Crime rate
Condell Park
115.1 / 1k
Georges Hall
29.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Condell Park
141
Georges Hall
156
Population
Condell Park
13,066
Georges Hall
9,739
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Condell Park | Georges Hall |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.4/100 | 59.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.6/100 | 51.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 115.1 / 1k | 29.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 137 | 120 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 141 | 156 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 15 |
| Population | 13,066 | 9,739 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Condell Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Georges Hall is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Condell Park pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Georges Hall is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Georges Hall, while Condell Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.