Overall score
Bass Hill
52.4/100
Condell Park
57.4/100
Condell Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bass Hill
52.4/100
Condell Park
57.4/100
Crime rate
Bass Hill
96.3 / 1k
Condell Park
115.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bass Hill
110
Condell Park
141
Population
Bass Hill
10,230
Condell Park
13,066
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bass Hill | Condell Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.4/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 36.2/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 96.3 / 1k | 115.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 10 |
| Public transport stops | 112 | 137 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 110 | 141 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 23 |
| Population | 10,230 | 13,066 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Bass Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Condell Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Bass Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Condell Park answers with housing affordability and public transport access. Bass Hill generally means more approachable housing costs, while Condell Park leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Condell Park, while Bass Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.