Condon vs Kelso, QLD suburb comparison

Condon for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CondonKelso

Overall score

Condon

39.2/100

Kelso

36.2/100

Crime rate

Condon

68.2 / 1k

Kelso

68.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Condon

19

Kelso

8

Population

Condon

5,894

Kelso

10,599

Metric leadCondon 5Kelso 22 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCondonKelso
Overall score39.2/10036.2/100
Housing (desirability)75.3/10074.0/100
Crime rate68.2 / 1k68.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Parks & reserves411
Walkability3.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities198
Population5,89410,599
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Condon is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Kelso is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Condon tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Kelso stands out for parks and reserves and a larger local community.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Condon, while Kelso remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons