Overall score
Cororooke
44.8/100
Irrewarra
41.4/100
Cororooke vs Irrewarra, VIC Suburb Comparison
Cororooke for retirees and families; Irrewarra for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CororookeIrrewarra
Crime rate
Cororooke
30.5 / 1k
Irrewarra
107.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cororooke
3
Irrewarra
3
Population
Cororooke
358
Irrewarra
365
Metric leadCororooke 3Irrewarra 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cororooke | Irrewarra |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.8/100 | 41.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.2/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.5 / 1k | 107.8 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 2 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Population | 358 | 365 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Cororooke reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Irrewarra is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Cororooke pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, whereas Irrewarra is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Cororooke sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Irrewarra.
On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Cororooke, while Irrewarra remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.