Cosgrove vs Kirwan, QLD suburb comparison

Cosgrove for retirees; Kirwan for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CosgroveKirwan

Overall score

Cosgrove

39.0/100

Kirwan

62.2/100

Crime rate

Cosgrove

40.4 / 1k

Kirwan

65.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cosgrove

9

Kirwan

78

Population

Cosgrove

665

Kirwan

20,780

Metric leadCosgrove 3Kirwan 6across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCosgroveKirwan
Overall score39.0/10062.2/100
Housing (desirability)78.9/10076.0/100
Crime rate40.4 / 1k65.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools15
Parks & reserves221
Walkability0.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities978
Population66520,780
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Cosgrove reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Kirwan is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Cosgrove is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Kirwan answers with parks and reserves and walkability. On housing, Cosgrove sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Kirwan.

On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kirwan, while Cosgrove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons