Overall score
Cosgrove
39.0/100
Mount Louisa
44.3/100
Cosgrove vs Mount Louisa, QLD suburb comparison
Cosgrove for retirees and families; Mount Louisa for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CosgroveMount Louisa
Crime rate
Cosgrove
40.4 / 1k
Mount Louisa
114.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cosgrove
9
Mount Louisa
15
Population
Cosgrove
665
Mount Louisa
9,227
Metric leadCosgrove 1Mount Louisa 8across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesCosgrove
- Best for familiesCosgrove
- Best for best valueMount Louisa
- Best for best schoolsMount Louisa
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cosgrove | Mount Louisa |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.0/100 | 44.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 78.9/100 | 79.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.4 / 1k | 114.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 8 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 25.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 9 | 15 |
| Population | 665 | 9,227 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Cosgrove is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Mount Louisa is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Louisa sits among greener hillside streets, while Cosgrove keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Cosgrove tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, while Mount Louisa stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Choose Cosgrove if you are weighing families; lean toward Mount Louisa for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.