Burdell vs Cosgrove, QLD suburb comparison

Burdell for retirees; Cosgrove for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BurdellCosgrove

Overall score

Burdell

43.3/100

Cosgrove

39.0/100

Crime rate

Burdell

40.4 / 1k

Cosgrove

40.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burdell

14

Cosgrove

9

Population

Burdell

7,171

Cosgrove

665

Metric leadBurdell 5Cosgrove 04 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurdellCosgrove
Overall score43.3/10039.0/100
Housing (desirability)79.7/10078.9/100
Crime rate40.4 / 1k40.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves22
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities149
Population7,171665
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Burdell is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace, and Cosgrove is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Burdell tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Cosgrove stands out for a country-town feel.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Burdell, while Cosgrove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons