Burdell vs Mount Low, QLD Suburb Comparison

Burdell for retirees; Mount Low for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BurdellMount Low

Overall score

Burdell

35.0/100

Mount Low

33.4/100

Crime rate

Burdell

65.7 / 1k

Mount Low

65.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burdell

14

Mount Low

23

Population

Burdell

7,171

Mount Low

5,488

Metric leadBurdell 5Mount Low 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurdellMount Low
Overall score35.0/10033.4/100
Housing (desirability)50.4/10051.5/100
Crime rate65.7 / 1k65.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)19.8/10019.8/100
Parks & reserves21
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1423
Green cover2.5%0.6%
Population7,1715,488
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Burdell reads as a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace; Mount Low is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Burdell keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Burdell tends to lead on parks and reserves, overall desirability, and a larger local community, while Mount Low stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Low, while Burdell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons