Burdell vs Mount Low, QLD suburb comparison

Mount Low for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BurdellMount Low

Overall score

Burdell

43.3/100

Mount Low

42.2/100

Crime rate

Burdell

40.4 / 1k

Mount Low

40.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burdell

14

Mount Low

18

Population

Burdell

7,171

Mount Low

5,488

Metric leadBurdell 4Mount Low 23 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurdellMount Low
Overall score43.3/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)79.7/10091.7/100
Crime rate40.4 / 1k40.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves21
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1418
Population7,1715,488
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Burdell reads as a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace; Mount Low is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Burdell keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Burdell tends to lead on parks and reserves and overall desirability, while Mount Low stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Burdell if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Mount Low for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons