Deeragun vs Mount Low, QLD suburb comparison

Mount Low for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DeeragunMount Low

Overall score

Deeragun

43.1/100

Mount Low

42.2/100

Crime rate

Deeragun

40.4 / 1k

Mount Low

40.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Deeragun

32

Mount Low

18

Population

Deeragun

4,273

Mount Low

5,488

Metric leadDeeragun 5Mount Low 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDeeragunMount Low
Overall score43.1/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)68.9/10091.7/100
Crime rate40.4 / 1k40.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Parks & reserves31
Walkability27.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities3218
Population4,2735,488
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Deeragun is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Low is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Deeragun keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Deeragun pulls ahead on parks and reserves and walkability, whereas Mount Low is the better pick for housing affordability and a larger local community. On housing, Deeragun sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Low.

Deeragun suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mount Low is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons