Jensen vs Mount Low, QLD Suburb Comparison

Jensen for investment; Mount Low for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JensenMount Low

Overall score

Jensen

33.4/100

Mount Low

33.4/100

Crime rate

Jensen

65.9 / 1k

Mount Low

65.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jensen

1

Mount Low

23

Population

Jensen

1,797

Mount Low

5,488

Metric leadJensen 0Mount Low 46 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJensenMount Low
Overall score33.4/10033.4/100
Housing (desirability)51.3/10051.5/100
Crime rate65.9 / 1k65.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)19.8/10019.8/100
Parks & reserves11
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities123
Green cover0.6%0.6%
Population1,7975,488
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Jensen reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Mount Low is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Jensen keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Jensen pulls ahead on a country-town feel, plus rapid growth and new development, whereas Mount Low is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities, overall desirability, and a larger local community. On housing, Jensen sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Low.

Choose Jensen if you are weighing families; lean toward Mount Low for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons