Overall score
Jensen
33.4/100
Mount Low
33.4/100
Jensen for investment; Mount Low for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Jensen
33.4/100
Mount Low
33.4/100
Crime rate
Jensen
65.9 / 1k
Mount Low
65.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jensen
1
Mount Low
23
Population
Jensen
1,797
Mount Low
5,488
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jensen | Mount Low |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.4/100 | 33.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.3/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.9 / 1k | 65.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 19.8/100 | 19.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 23 |
| Green cover | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Population | 1,797 | 5,488 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 6/10 |
Jensen reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Mount Low is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Jensen keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Jensen pulls ahead on a country-town feel, plus rapid growth and new development, whereas Mount Low is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities, overall desirability, and a larger local community. On housing, Jensen sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Low.
Choose Jensen if you are weighing families; lean toward Mount Low for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.