Mount Low vs Yabulu, QLD Suburb Comparison

Mount Low for families; Yabulu for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount LowYabulu

Overall score

Mount Low

33.4/100

Yabulu

35.5/100

Crime rate

Mount Low

65.6 / 1k

Yabulu

65.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Low

23

Yabulu

1

Population

Mount Low

5,488

Yabulu

719

Metric leadMount Low 4Yabulu 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount LowYabulu
Overall score33.4/10035.5/100
Housing (desirability)51.5/10063.5/100
Crime rate65.6 / 1k65.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)19.8/10019.8/100
Parks & reserves1—
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities231
Green cover0.6%0.0%
Population5,488719
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/101/10

Comparison summary

Mount Low reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Yabulu is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Yabulu keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Low is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Yabulu answers with a country-town feel and relatively affordable housing. On housing, Mount Low sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Yabulu.

Mount Low suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Yabulu is the stronger match for families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons