Overall score
Mount Low
33.4/100
Yabulu
35.5/100
Mount Low for families; Yabulu for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Low
33.4/100
Yabulu
35.5/100
Crime rate
Mount Low
65.6 / 1k
Yabulu
65.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Low
23
Yabulu
1
Population
Mount Low
5,488
Yabulu
719
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Low | Yabulu |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.4/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.5/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.6 / 1k | 65.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 19.8/100 | 19.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 23 | 1 |
| Green cover | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 5,488 | 719 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Mount Low reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Yabulu is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Low sits among greener hillside streets, while Yabulu keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Low is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Yabulu answers with a country-town feel and relatively affordable housing. On housing, Mount Low sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Yabulu.
Mount Low suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Yabulu is the stronger match for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.