Overall score
Mount Louisa
44.3/100
Shaw
39.0/100
Mount Louisa vs Shaw, QLD suburb comparison
Mount Louisa for investment and value; Shaw for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount LouisaShaw
Crime rate
Mount Louisa
114.3 / 1k
Shaw
40.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Louisa
15
Shaw
5
Population
Mount Louisa
9,227
Shaw
760
Metric leadMount Louisa 6Shaw 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesShaw
- Best for familiesShaw
- Best for investmentMount Louisa
- Best for best valueMount Louisa
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Louisa | Shaw |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.3/100 | 39.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.7/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 114.3 / 1k | 40.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 2 |
| Walkability | 25.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 5 |
| Population | 9,227 | 760 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Mount Louisa is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Shaw is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Mount Louisa sits among greener hillside streets, while Shaw keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Louisa is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Shaw answers with a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Mount Louisa sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Shaw.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Mount Louisa the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Shaw.