Overall score
Cowandilla
33.5/100
Fulham
50.2/100
Fulham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cowandilla
33.5/100
Fulham
50.2/100
Crime rate
Cowandilla
52.3 / 1k
Fulham
78.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cowandilla
41
Fulham
64
Population
Cowandilla
1,455
Fulham
2,920
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cowandilla | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.5/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.1/100 | 17.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 52.3 / 1k | 78.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Public transport stops | 8 | 14 |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 64 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 52 |
| Population | 1,455 | 2,920 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Cowandilla is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Fulham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Cowandilla is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Fulham answers with public transport access and walkability.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fulham, while Cowandilla remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.