Brooklyn Park vs Fulham, SA suburb comparison

Brooklyn Park for retirees and investment; Fulham for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Brooklyn ParkFulham

Overall score

Brooklyn Park

50.8/100

Fulham

50.2/100

Crime rate

Brooklyn Park

55.6 / 1k

Fulham

78.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Brooklyn Park

136

Fulham

64

Population

Brooklyn Park

5,040

Fulham

2,920

Metric leadBrooklyn Park 8Fulham 1across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBrooklyn ParkFulham
Overall score50.8/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)25.2/10017.1/100
Crime rate55.6 / 1k78.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops1914
Walkability69.5/10056.0/100
Nearby amenities13664
Planning activity4152
Population5,0402,920
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Brooklyn Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Fulham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Brooklyn Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Fulham stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Retirees and value-focused buyers may find Brooklyn Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fulham.

Related comparisons