Brooklyn Park vs Fulham, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Brooklyn Park | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.7/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 25.2/100 | 17.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.7 / 1k | 87.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 14 |
| Walkability | 69.5/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 136 | 64 |
| Planning activity | 35 | 40 |
| Population | 5,040 | 2,920 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBrooklyn Park
- Best for familiesBrooklyn Park
- Best for investmentBrooklyn Park
- Best for best valueBrooklyn Park
- Best for best schoolsBrooklyn Park
Comparison summary
Brooklyn Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Fulham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Brooklyn Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Fulham stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Brooklyn Park, while Fulham remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.